17978 gsha mutant strains (ATCC)
Structured Review

17978 Gsha Mutant Strains, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 2551 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/17978 gsha mutant strains/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 2551 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The glutathione pathway is required for biofilm formation in Acinetobacter baumannii"
Article Title: The glutathione pathway is required for biofilm formation in Acinetobacter baumannii
Journal: Current Research in Microbial Sciences
doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2026.100562
Figure Legend Snippet: Growth rates of A. baumannii gsh mutant strains in liquid tryptic soy broth media. Strains were grown in triplicate in 10 mL media in 50 mL conical tubes. Logarithmically growing cultures were diluted to 0.05 OD 600 in TSB and incubated at 37 °C with shaking. Aliquots were taken at specific timepoints and (a) OD 600 and (b) CFUs were determined; wildtype (black solid line, closed square), WTev (black dashed line, open square), gshA − ( red solid line, closed square), gshA-C (red dashed line, open square), gshB − (blue solid line, closed square), gshB-C (blue dashed line, open square). Error bars indicate standard deviation calculated from three independent biological replicates at each timepoint.
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Incubation, Standard Deviation
Figure Legend Snippet: Biofilm formation in A. baumannii gsh and gsnoR mutant strains. (a) Biofilm dry weight assay in tryptic soy broth, (b) biofilm optical density assay in tryptic soy broth, (c) biofilm optical density assay in LB. A. baumannii gshA, gshB, gsnoR1 , and gsnoR2 mutant, complemented, and isogenic wildtype strains were examined. The assay was performed with three independent biological replicates, each with two technical replicates. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired Student’s t -test. P -values are indicated as * = 0.05, ** = 0.01, *** = 0.001, **** = 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) analysis of biofilms. (a) Top-views (upper) and side-views (lower) CSLM images of representative biofilms formed by A. baumannii strains: WT, WTev, gshA − , gshA-C, gshB − , gshB-C, gsnoR1 − , gsnoR1-C, gsnoR2 − , and gsnoR2-C. Biofilms were grown in tryptic soy broth in 12-well plates, stained with Syto13 nucleic acid stain, and imaged using a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope using a 488/561 nm diode laser. Z-stacks were acquired at 652 × 652 pixels with 0.5 μm intervals using a 40× water-dipping objective. Images were processed in ImageJ using the "Project Stacks" function to generate top and side views. Scale bars = 25 μm. (b) The area of clumping (µm²) of the strains. Aggregate areas were quantified from the CSLM images by selecting three clumped aggregates from three independent fields of view per strain. The gshA − mutant formed significantly larger aggregates compared to the WT and its complemented strain. Data plotted represents mean aggregate area, and error bars indicate standard deviation. Statistical analysis comparing each mutant strain to its respective complemented strain is shown and was performed by one-way ANOVA. ns, not significant; **** P < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Microscopy, Staining, Mutagenesis, Standard Deviation

